Thursday, February 9, 2012

Public Safety Group Disputes FCC's Claim On Spectrum

July 7, 2010

A coalition of public safety officials from around the country struck back Wednesday against the FCC's claims that its proposal included in the national broadband plan for building a interoperable public safety network will adequately serve the needs of emergency first responders.

The Public Safety Alliance, which includes groups representing police chiefs, fire chiefs, and others, issued its own white paper in response to one released last month by the FCC that argued that the commission's public safety proposals are adequate to meet public safety's needs. The FCC has called for providing public safety officials with 10 megahertz of spectrum and auctioning off another chunk of spectrum known as the D-Block to commercial providers to help pay for building a public safety broadband network. It also calls for giving public safety officials priority access to roam on commercial networks during emergencies.

The alliance and state and local officials say the FCC's plan will not meet the needs of public safety officials, who have called on the FCC to give them the D-block spectrum in addition to the 10 megahertz called for in the broadband plan. The alliance argues that the FCC's white paper "makes far too many assumptions and relies on conjecture to develop its misguided policy framework that will put public safety users at risk."

For example, the alliance said the FCC has "greatly" underestimated the current and future capacity needs of public safety by allocating only 10 megahertz of broadband spectrum for such tasks as mission-critical high-speed data, high-resolution two-way video conferencing, video monitoring and surveillance at an incident, multi-agency IP-based voice communications with push-to-talk services and other high-bandwidth applications.

The alliance's paper also takes issue with the FCC's claim that the 10 megahertz will provide more than enough capacity for day-to-day communications for public safety officials and also faulted the FCC for not seeking "meaningful input" from public safety officials.

"Public safety has repeatedly argued that the additional 10 megahertz of paired spectrum that would be gained through a D-Block allocation is necessary to ensure reliable operation of the public safety broadband network in the long term," according to the paper.

In a statement, James Barnett, chief of the FCC's Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, noted that the FCC's plan is supported by the Fraternal Order of Police and the International Association of Firefighters and is aimed at ensuring that a national interoperable broadband public safety network moves from "talk to reality."

"Following months of study and extensive consultation with public safety groups and others, the national broadband plan puts forward a realistic, cost-effective proposal for achieving this long overdue goal," he added. "Our concern is that other proposals will cost more than $35 billion and therefore will never be built or will leave out rural and suburban communities instead of providing a truly comprehensive nationwide network for America's first responders."

Energy and Commerce Communications Subcommittee Chairman Rick Boucher, D-Va., has unveiled draft legislation that would implement the FCC's public safety network recommendations and authorize additional funds to make up for any shortfall in funds from the auction of the D-Block spectrum to pay for building the network.

The controversy will get more attention this Saturday at the National Governors Association annual meeting in Boston. The NGA's Special Committee on Homeland Security and Public Safety is hosting a discussion on the FCC's plan and state and local officials' concerns.

"Public safety officials need a nationwide interoperable communications network to protect the public. Governors believe that dedication of the D-Block for this purpose is the best way to meet our public safety obligations," Gov. Tim Pawlenty, R-Minn., co-chairman of the special committee said in a news release last week announcing the session. "The FCC's proposal to auction the D-block for commercial purposes is counter to those interests and we hope they will reconsider."

Join the Discussion

The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.

Comments powered by Disqus

 

Archives

Monthly Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

Recent Comments


Contributors

Juliana Gruenwald

Tech Writer

E-Mail: jgruenwald@nationaljournal.com.


Juliana Gruenwald has been covering tech and telecom issues for more than a decade for National Journal, Interactive Week, BNA and Congressional Quarterly. This is her second stint with National Journal. She was recruited by NJ in 1998 to help launch its first tech policy publication, Technology Daily. She left in 2000 to cover international tech and telecom issues for Ziff Davis Media's Interactive Week magazine. She started her career at United Press International as the wire service's first Helen Thomas Intern. She has a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Minnesota. A Minneapolis native, she misses the lakes but not the cold.


Josh Smith

Tech Reporter

E-Mail: joshsmith@nationaljournal.com.


Josh Smith covers technology policy as a staff reporter for National Journal. He previously interned at National Journal Daily, a Senate press office, and the Deseret News in Salt Lake City where he covered the state legislature, courts, and crime. In 2009 he graduated with honors from Southern Utah University after managing an award-winning student newspaper as editor-in-chief. Josh has received state, regional and national awards for his political and policy reporting, including first place in CapitolBeat’s 2009 Best of Statehouse Reporting college competition. A native of drop-dead-gorgeous Utah, Josh lives in Virginia with his wife, Amber.