IT Coalition Backs PTO Fee Bill
A coalition of big tech firms that oppose the latest version of a Senate patent overhaul bill said Monday they back a stand-alone measure that would allow the Patent and Trademark Office to set its own fees.
The House Tuesday is set to take up the bill, drafted by House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers, D-Mich., that would give the PTO fee-setting authority.
In a letter Monday to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, the Coalition for Patent Fairness noted the huge backlog - more than 750,000 - of patent applications awaiting examination and said allowing the agency to set its own fees, using an appropriate rulemaking process, will give the agency the resources it needs to reduce the time it currently takes innovators to obtain a patent.
The coalition's support comes on the same day that two other groups that back the broader compromise patent overhaul measure offered by the Senate Judiciary Committee's leaders came out against the stand-alone fee setting bill because it does not include language barring the diversion of PTO fees for other government activities. The Coalition for Patent Fairness agrees this is an important concern but said the PTO's need for additional funding outweighs the issue. In the letter, the coalition said the PTO's need for additional funding should not be held back by those who favor a broader patent overhaul bill.
"Some oppose this simple, common sense legislation on the ground that it is limited to
providing needed funds to the PTO and does not include other proposed reforms of the patent system that supposedly have received 'widespread support,'" the coalition said. "...Relief for the PTO--and for the thousands of companies and individuals unable to bring their inventions to market because of the agency's backlog--should not be held hostage to these other issues."
The coalition, which includes firms such as Apple, Google, Intel and Oracle, supported the patent overhaul bill approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee last year, but pulled that support after Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and ranking member Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., unveiled a compromise package in April that made several changes aimed at bringing some lawmakers and groups on board.
Conyers, House Judiciary ranking member Lamar Smith, R-Texas, and other House Judiciary members have been negotiating with their Senate counterparts in an effort to address many of the same issues raised by the coalition, but so far the talks have yet to yield a deal. Conyers noted this lack of progress during a hearing earlier this month at which he said he was considering drafting a stand-alone PTO fee-setting bill.
Join the Discussion
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus