Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Comcast Disputes Case's Meaning

January 11, 2010 | 12:12 PM

In a blog post Monday, Comcast Executive Vice President David Cohen argued that the cable provider's challenge against an FCC enforcement action is not a fight about network neutrality, as some public interest groups and others have portrayed it, but is instead about the FCC overstepping its authority. A federal appeals court Friday heard arguments in Comcast's challenge to the FCC's enforcement action against the cable provider two years ago for impeding customer access to sites such as BitTorrent that enable the sharing of movies, video games and other files.

"The primary basis for our challenge, and the basis on which we hope the court will decide this case, is that no federal agency can subject any company or individual to sanctions for violation of federal standards when there was no law in the first place," Cohen wrote. "This is a basic issue of fair notice, regardless of the issue at stake. So it shouldn't matter whether you are for or against 'net neutrality' regulation -- this is simply not the way the government should conduct its business."

The FCC's enforcement action was based on a policy statement rather than formal rules, prompting Comcast to challenge the government in court by arguing the FCC lacked authority to chastise it before adopting official regulations. Still, FCC General Counsel Austin Schlick and others indicated Friday that a ruling against the commission could affect current FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski's efforts to impose network neutrality rules, which would prevent network operators from prioritizing certain types of content.

"If the FCC -- or any agency -- wants to regulate in an area, it needs first to establish binding regulations and apply them properly, consistent with the process that Chairman Genachowski has now proposed," Cohen said.

Join the Discussion

The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.

Comments powered by Disqus

 

Search This Blog
Archives

Monthly Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

Recent Comments


Contributors

Juliana Gruenwald

Tech Writer

E-Mail: jgruenwald@nationaljournal.com.


Juliana Gruenwald has been covering tech and telecom issues for more than a decade for National Journal, Interactive Week, BNA and Congressional Quarterly. This is her second stint with National Journal. She was recruited by NJ in 1998 to help launch its first tech policy publication, Technology Daily. She left in 2000 to cover international tech and telecom issues for Ziff Davis Media's Interactive Week magazine. She started her career at United Press International as the wire service's first Helen Thomas Intern. She has a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Minnesota. A Minneapolis native, she misses the lakes but not the cold.


Josh Smith

Tech Reporter

E-Mail: joshsmith@nationaljournal.com.


Josh Smith covers technology policy as a staff reporter for National Journal. He previously interned at National Journal Daily, a Senate press office, and the Deseret News in Salt Lake City where he covered the state legislature, courts, and crime. In 2009 he graduated with honors from Southern Utah University after managing an award-winning student newspaper as editor-in-chief. Josh has received state, regional and national awards for his political and policy reporting, including first place in CapitolBeat’s 2009 Best of Statehouse Reporting college competition. A native of drop-dead-gorgeous Utah, Josh lives in Virginia with his wife, Amber.