<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Tech Daily Dose: NBC On Record Opposing Consolidation</title>
        <link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/12/nbc-on-record-opposing-consoli.php?rss=1</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 23:25:45 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
       
        <item>
            <title>NBC On Record Opposing Consolidation</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>NBC Universal, which claims its pending merger with Comcast would be a boon for consumers, warned of dire consequences nine years ago when Time Warner and AOL wanted to combine. In a July 24, 2000 letter to the FCC, there was this: "Given the size and scope of the proposed merged company, AOL/Time Warner will have both the ability and the incentive to discriminate against unaffiliated content providers such as NBC." The Peacock network also urged the agency "to establish firm principles of non-discrimination in the treatment of unaffiliated content providers in the broadband services marketplace" -- a step that Comcast is now trying to prevent the FCC from taking.</p>

<p>The document, obtained by Tech Daily Dose, is certain to provide ammunition to critics of the proposed Comcast-NBC deal, who will argue that the broadcast network had it right in 2000. The marriage of Time Warner and AOL sputtered, of course, resulting in the spin-off of AOL from its parent, a process set to culminate this week. The letter was signed by NBC Executive Vice President and General Counsel <strong>Rick Cotton</strong>, who observed during a Friday press briefing that predictions about the dominance of a merged Time Warner-AOL never materialized. Of course, if he and others at NBC had gotten their way, the deal might never have been approved. While his missive back in 2000 didn't explicitly demand the merger be blocked, it implied it. NBC stated at the time that if the transaction was approved, substantial conditions would be required to protect the public interest -- an argument critics of the Comcast-NBC alliance will likely make.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/12/nbc-on-record-opposing-consoli.php?rss=1</link>
            <guid>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/12/nbc-on-record-opposing-consoli.php?rss=1</guid>

            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 23:25:45 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
		
		
			<item>
				<title>computer internet security responded on January 14, 10 05:50 PM</title>
				<description>

					
&lt;div class="ad" style="float:right;margin: 0px, 0, 10, 10;"&gt;
&lt;h6&gt;Advertisement&lt;/h6&gt;
&lt;a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=techdailydose;series=techdailydose;medium=rss;sz=300x250,336x280;ord=144133438?" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=techdailydose;series=techdailydose;medium=rss;sz=300x250,336x280;ord=144133438?" border="0" alt=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;



					<![CDATA[I suppose I'm gonna need to do some more research, but this is a really good place to start....]]>
				</description>
				<link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/12/nbc-on-record-opposing-consoli.php?rss=1#1406127</link>
				<guid>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/12/nbc-on-record-opposing-consoli.php?rss=1#1406127</guid>
				<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:50:03 GMT</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kelly Sheehy responded on January  4, 10 05:40 PM</title>
				<description>

					
&lt;div class="ad" style="float:right;margin: 0px, 0, 10, 10;"&gt;
&lt;h6&gt;Advertisement&lt;/h6&gt;
&lt;a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=techdailydose;series=techdailydose;medium=rss;sz=300x250,336x280;ord=144133438?" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=techdailydose;series=techdailydose;medium=rss;sz=300x250,336x280;ord=144133438?" border="0" alt=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;



					<![CDATA[Thanks very much for sharing this interesting post. I am just starting up my own blog and this has given me inspiration to what I can achieve....]]>
				</description>
				<link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/12/nbc-on-record-opposing-consoli.php?rss=1#1403244</link>
				<guid>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/12/nbc-on-record-opposing-consoli.php?rss=1#1403244</guid>
				<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:40:42 GMT</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JOB responded on December 10, 09 12:50 PM</title>
				<description>

					
&lt;div class="ad" style="float:right;margin: 0px, 0, 10, 10;"&gt;
&lt;h6&gt;Advertisement&lt;/h6&gt;
&lt;a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=techdailydose;series=techdailydose;medium=rss;sz=300x250,336x280;ord=144133438?" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=techdailydose;series=techdailydose;medium=rss;sz=300x250,336x280;ord=144133438?" border="0" alt=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;



					<![CDATA[<p>Oh. what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to control what others percive. Or in modern noun/verb language, to 'market' your consolidation monopoly plan. NBC's deception by other means establishes for the hundredth time the powerful public policy case for breaking up the five media 'market' monopolies. The transnational media empires should broken into dozens of more independent and locally responsive, locally controlled and carefully regulated corporations. </p>...]]>
				</description>
				<link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/12/nbc-on-record-opposing-consoli.php?rss=1#1401222</link>
				<guid>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/12/nbc-on-record-opposing-consoli.php?rss=1#1401222</guid>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:50:43 GMT</pubDate>
			</item>
		


       
    </channel>
</rss>
 
