<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Tech Daily Dose: Scientific Integrity, Transparency Questioned</title>
        <link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/scientific-integrity-transpare.php?rss=1</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:57:11 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
       
        <item>
            <title>Scientific Integrity, Transparency Questioned</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>The top Republican on a House Science Committee panel thinks the <strong>Obama </strong>administration is dragging its feet when it comes to pursing its scientific integrity and transparency agendas. Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight ranking member <strong>Paul Broun</strong>, R-Ga., wrote to White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Director <strong>John Holdren</strong> in July and again Friday requesting details about recent events at several agencies that could reveal "a troubling pattern" of political motives clashing with scientific debate.</p>

<p>Broun requested a plan from the administration to reconcile the discrepancies associated with the events with the administration's principles of scientific integrity and transparency as outlined in President Obama's Jan. 21 and March 9 memos to agency heads. To ensure whistleblower protections, Broun asked for a plan to guarantee that negative employment actions will not be taken against individuals who present information contrary to the administration's policy goals.</p>

<p>"As additional issues regarding scientific integrity continue to mount, I sincerely hope your office's recommendations will ensure this administration's actions will match its rhetoric," Broun added.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/scientific-integrity-transpare.php?rss=1</link>
            <guid>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/scientific-integrity-transpare.php?rss=1</guid>

            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:57:11 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
		
		
			<item>
				<title>Adam responded on December 23, 09 04:23 PM</title>
				<description>

					
&lt;div class="ad" style="float:right;margin: 0px, 0, 10, 10;"&gt;
&lt;h6&gt;Advertisement&lt;/h6&gt;
&lt;a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=techdailydose;series=techdailydose;medium=rss;sz=300x250,336x280;ord=144133712?" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=techdailydose;series=techdailydose;medium=rss;sz=300x250,336x280;ord=144133712?" border="0" alt=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;



					<![CDATA[Just want to say your article is striking. The clearness in your post is simply impressive and i can take for granted you are an expert on this field. Well with your permission allow me to grab your rss feed to keep up to date with succeeding post. Thanks a million and please keep up the fabulous work....]]>
				</description>
				<link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/scientific-integrity-transpare.php?rss=1#1402506</link>
				<guid>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/scientific-integrity-transpare.php?rss=1#1402506</guid>
				<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:23:19 GMT</pubDate>
			</item>
		


       
    </channel>
</rss>
 
