<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Tech Daily Dose: PTO Chief: &apos;Get Patent Reform Done Now&apos;</title>
        <link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/pto-chief-get-patent-reform-do.php?rss=1</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:21:20 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
       
        <item>
            <title>PTO Chief: &apos;Get Patent Reform Done Now&apos;</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Kappos_AIPLA09.jpg" src="http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/Kappos_AIPLA09.jpg" width="250" height="256" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></span>Patent and Trademark Office Director <strong>David Kappos</strong> on Thursday urged industry stakeholders and lawmakers to "move together in the spirit of compromise and get patent reform done now." Speaking at the American Intellectual Property Law Association, he pressed the group's members to "show leadership" because "50 years is long enough to wait" for meaningful overhauls to the U.S. patent system. He stressed that "not everyone is getting everything they want" from the bill that emerged from the Senate Judiciary Committee in April but the measure is a "major positive step" for the life sciences sector, small innovators and the IT industry.</p>

<p>Senate Judiciary Chairman <strong>Patrick Leahy</strong> earlier this month said he wants to work with Majority Leader <strong>Harry Reid </strong>to schedule, before the end of the year, Senate debate his bill. His announcement came as Commerce Secretary <strong>Gary Locke</strong> indicated the <strong>Obama </strong>administration's support of the controversial measure. House Judiciary Chairman <strong>John Conyers</strong> introduced a companion bill but it remains to be seen how the bill will evolve and whether it will look similar to the compromise that Leahy brokered with Sens. <strong>Arlen Specter</strong>, D-Pa., and <strong>Dianne Feinstein</strong>, D-Calif.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/pto-chief-get-patent-reform-do.php?rss=1</link>
            <guid>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/pto-chief-get-patent-reform-do.php?rss=1</guid>

            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:21:20 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
		
		
			<item>
				<title>staff2 responded on October 15, 09 07:44 PM</title>
				<description>

					
&lt;div class="ad" style="float:right;margin: 0px, 0, 10, 10;"&gt;
&lt;h6&gt;Advertisement&lt;/h6&gt;
&lt;a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=techdailydose;series=techdailydose;medium=rss;sz=300x250,336x280;ord=144133641?" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=techdailydose;series=techdailydose;medium=rss;sz=300x250,336x280;ord=144133641?" border="0" alt=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;



					<![CDATA[<p>&quot;He stressed that &quot;not everyone is getting everything they want&quot; from the bill that emerged from the Senate Judiciary Committee in April but the measure <strong>is a &quot;major positive step&quot; for the life sciences sector, small innovators</strong> and the IT industry.&quot;</p>
<p>That is not true!</p>
<p>Patent reform is a fraud on America...<br />
Please see <a href="http://truereform.piausa.org/">http://truereform.piausa.org/</a> for a different/opposing view on patent reform.</p>...]]>
				</description>
				<link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/pto-chief-get-patent-reform-do.php?rss=1#1376126</link>
				<guid>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/pto-chief-get-patent-reform-do.php?rss=1#1376126</guid>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:44:31 GMT</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>staff2 responded on October 15, 09 07:43 PM</title>
				<description>

					
&lt;div class="ad" style="float:right;margin: 0px, 0, 10, 10;"&gt;
&lt;h6&gt;Advertisement&lt;/h6&gt;
&lt;a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=techdailydose;series=techdailydose;medium=rss;sz=300x250,336x280;ord=144133641?" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=techdailydose;series=techdailydose;medium=rss;sz=300x250,336x280;ord=144133641?" border="0" alt=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;



					<![CDATA[<p>&quot;He stressed that &quot;not everyone is getting everything they want&quot; from the bill that emerged from the Senate Judiciary Committee in April but the measure <strong>is a &quot;major positive step&quot; for the life sciences sector, small innovators</strong> and the IT industry.&quot;</p>
<p>That is not true!</p>
<p>Patent reform is a fraud on America...<br />
Please see <a href="http://truereform.piausa.org/">http://truereform.piausa.org/</a> for a different/opposing view on patent reform.</p>...]]>
				</description>
				<link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/pto-chief-get-patent-reform-do.php?rss=1#1376125</link>
				<guid>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/pto-chief-get-patent-reform-do.php?rss=1#1376125</guid>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			</item>
		


       
    </channel>
</rss>
 
