My Account | Free Trial | Sign In
Submit site feedback
National Journal.com

nationaljournal.com > Tech Daily Dose

NationalJournal.com Home Under the Influence Experts Experts Home Under the Influence Experts Home

National Journal's Tech Daily Dose

Congress, E-Government

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Rep. Lynn Jenkins, R-Kan., introduced a resolution to change House rules and require committees to post the actual text of adopted bills and amendments online within 24 hours. She argued in a press release that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's pledge for an open and transparent Congress has fallen short and lawmakers have failed to require transparency for one of the most powerful components of Congress -- congressional committees. "The federal government functions best when it governs in the light of day," she said.

Over the past nine months, major bills have repeatedly been drafted, filed and then changed in the dark of night or behind closed-doors, Jenkins added. The freshman lawmaker argued that it happened with the economic stimulus package, the House Energy and Commerce energy bill, and the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee's healthcare overhaul legislation. "This is only my first year in Washington, but if this is 'business as usual,' then it's time for business to change," she said.

House Minority Leader John Boehner praised Jenkins saying that "the practice of secretly adding 'phantom amendments' to major bills after they pass committee is outrageous, and it should be banned." He argued that Senate HELP Democrats quietly made more than 70 changes to the healthcare bill after it was voted on in committee. Reps. Greg Walden, R-Ore., and John Culberson, R-Texas, have petitioned to change House rules to require all bills be posted online for at least 72 hours before being brought to a vote.

3 Responses

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Escort in London

It is certainly interesting for me to read that post. Thank author for it. I like such topics and everything connected to this matter. I would like to read a bit more soon.

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Marcus

Cool post as for me. It would be great to read a bit more about this topic.

Saturday, October 17, 2009

John Lloyd Scharf

What I want is for them to have the bill online for a day for every page or every billion dollars spent so that they could not pass a 1000 page bill in two years.

However, it would be reasonable an prudent to have them online for 24 hours plus one hour for every page of a bill. If the bill is 1000 pages and spends a trillion dollars, I want it online for a 1000 hours. I think 42 days is not only reasonable, but definitely required for the public to read and make input.

Leave a response



Get Print-friendly version of this page E-mail this page to a friend Subscribe to comments for Freshman Rep Wants Bills Online In 24 Hrs Follow us on Twitter

Blogroll

New Media

Online Politics

Tech Policy

Categories


Add Tech Daily Dose To Your Site

Advertisement
About    Contact    Employment    Reprints & Back Issues    Privacy Policy    Advertising
Copyright 2010 by National Journal Group Inc.
The Watergate · 600 New Hampshire Ave., NW Washington, DC 20037
202-739-8400· fax 202-833-8069 · NationalJournal.com is an Atlantic Media publication.