<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Tech Daily Dose: Blackburn Takes Swipe At Net Neutrality</title>
        <link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/blackburn-takes-swipe-at-net-n.php?rss=1</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:39:51 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
       
        <item>
            <title>Blackburn Takes Swipe At Net Neutrality</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="blackburn.jpg" src="http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/blackburn.jpg" width="200" height="273" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></span>House Energy and Commerce Communications Subcommittee member <strong>Marsha Blackburn</strong>, R-Tenn., on Tuesday took a swipe at an ongoing push by the <strong>Obama</strong> administration and high-tech companies to beef up so-called network neutrality rules at the FCC, describing effort as "the fairness doctrine for the Internet." The Commission rescinded that doctrine, which required TV and radio broadcasters to air opposing political viewpoints, in 1987. </p>

<p>FCC Chairman <strong>Julius Genachowski </strong>said in September that he does not intend to revive the fairness doctrine amid concerns raised by Republicans and conservative talk radio hosts. He is, however, championing a controversial plan to consider new rules aimed at preserving and promoting consumers' unfettered access to Web content. The FCC will begin its work on that topic Thursday.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/blackburn-takes-swipe-at-net-n.php?rss=1</link>
            <guid>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/blackburn-takes-swipe-at-net-n.php?rss=1</guid>

            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:39:51 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
		
		
			<item>
				<title>jojo responded on March 28, 10 12:48 PM</title>
				<description>

					
&lt;div class="ad" style="float:right;margin: 0px, 0, 10, 10;"&gt;
&lt;h6&gt;Advertisement&lt;/h6&gt;
&lt;a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=techdailydose;series=techdailydose;medium=rss;sz=300x250,336x280;ord=144133629?" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=techdailydose;series=techdailydose;medium=rss;sz=300x250,336x280;ord=144133629?" border="0" alt=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;



					<![CDATA[<p>c est quelques chose de fantastic de pouvoir gagner avec 770 un place pour <a href="http://www.top-bonus-casino-en-ligne.com/poker 770.php">WSOP</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.jouer-miser-gagner.com/">gagner</a>&nbsp;cette place gratuitement</p>...]]>
				</description>
				<link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/blackburn-takes-swipe-at-net-n.php?rss=1#1573333</link>
				<guid>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/blackburn-takes-swipe-at-net-n.php?rss=1#1573333</guid>
				<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:48:35 GMT</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>jim responded on October 21, 09 10:26 AM</title>
				<description>

					
&lt;div class="ad" style="float:right;margin: 0px, 0, 10, 10;"&gt;
&lt;h6&gt;Advertisement&lt;/h6&gt;
&lt;a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=techdailydose;series=techdailydose;medium=rss;sz=300x250,336x280;ord=144133629?" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=techdailydose;series=techdailydose;medium=rss;sz=300x250,336x280;ord=144133629?" border="0" alt=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;



					<![CDATA[<p>She didn't vote for this, they're two very&nbsp;different things. This is we say no to inovation so we can control the web. You know Obama's transperency.</p>...]]>
				</description>
				<link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/blackburn-takes-swipe-at-net-n.php?rss=1#1378742</link>
				<guid>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/blackburn-takes-swipe-at-net-n.php?rss=1#1378742</guid>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:26:02 GMT</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>jim responded on October 21, 09 10:09 AM</title>
				<description>

					
&lt;div class="ad" style="float:right;margin: 0px, 0, 10, 10;"&gt;
&lt;h6&gt;Advertisement&lt;/h6&gt;
&lt;a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=techdailydose;series=techdailydose;medium=rss;sz=300x250,336x280;ord=144133629?" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=techdailydose;series=techdailydose;medium=rss;sz=300x250,336x280;ord=144133629?" border="0" alt=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;



					<![CDATA[<p>She didn't vote for this, they're two very&nbsp;different things. This is we say no to inovation so we can control the web. You know Obama's transperency.</p>...]]>
				</description>
				<link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/blackburn-takes-swipe-at-net-n.php?rss=1#1378739</link>
				<guid>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/blackburn-takes-swipe-at-net-n.php?rss=1#1378739</guid>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:09:54 GMT</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mickey White responded on October 20, 09 10:44 PM</title>
				<description>

					
&lt;div class="ad" style="float:right;margin: 0px, 0, 10, 10;"&gt;
&lt;h6&gt;Advertisement&lt;/h6&gt;
&lt;a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=techdailydose;series=techdailydose;medium=rss;sz=300x250,336x280;ord=144133629?" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=techdailydose;series=techdailydose;medium=rss;sz=300x250,336x280;ord=144133629?" border="0" alt=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;



					<![CDATA[<p>Well why did Marsha Blackburn vote for This?&nbsp;</p>
<p>Electronic Surveillance.<br />
The warrantless electronic surveillance bill (H.R. 5825) would allow electronic surveillance of<br />
communications with suspected terrorists without first obtaining approval from the secret courts established by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978. Furthermore, the bill would authorize unwarranted surveillance for up to 90 days in some instances if a threat was considered &ldquo;imminent.&rdquo; Intelligence agencies would be allowed to conduct warrantless surveillance for seven days prior to gaining court approval if the threat was considered an emergency situation.&rdquo; This controversial bill had full support of the Bush administration as a means to provide greater national security in a post-9/11 world. The House passed H.R. 5825 on September 28, 2006 by a vote of 232-191 (Roll Call 502). Such a law would violate the Fourth Amendment by subjecting U.S. citizens to unreasonable searches and seizures.<br />
Marsha Blackburn voted FOR this bill.</p>
<p>See her unconstitutional votes at : <br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/qhayna">http://tinyurl.com/qhayna</a></p>...]]>
				</description>
				<link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/blackburn-takes-swipe-at-net-n.php?rss=1#1378589</link>
				<guid>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/blackburn-takes-swipe-at-net-n.php?rss=1#1378589</guid>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mickey White responded on October 20, 09 10:43 PM</title>
				<description>

					
&lt;div class="ad" style="float:right;margin: 0px, 0, 10, 10;"&gt;
&lt;h6&gt;Advertisement&lt;/h6&gt;
&lt;a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=techdailydose;series=techdailydose;medium=rss;sz=300x250,336x280;ord=144133629?" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=techdailydose;series=techdailydose;medium=rss;sz=300x250,336x280;ord=144133629?" border="0" alt=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;



					<![CDATA[<p>Well why did Marsha Blackburn vote for This?&nbsp;</p>
<p>Electronic Surveillance.<br />
The warrantless electronic surveillance bill (H.R. 5825) would allow electronic surveillance of<br />
communications with suspected terrorists without first obtaining approval from the secret courts established by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978. Furthermore, the bill would authorize unwarranted surveillance for up to 90 days in some instances if a threat was considered &ldquo;imminent.&rdquo; Intelligence agencies would be allowed to conduct warrantless surveillance for seven days prior to gaining court approval if the threat was considered an emergency situation.&rdquo; This controversial bill had full support of the Bush administration as a means to provide greater national security in a post-9/11 world. The House passed H.R. 5825 on September 28, 2006 by a vote of 232-191 (Roll Call 502). Such a law would violate the Fourth Amendment by subjecting U.S. citizens to unreasonable searches and seizures.<br />
Marsha Blackburn voted FOR this bill.</p>
<p>See her unconstitutional votes at : <br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/qhayna">http://tinyurl.com/qhayna</a></p>...]]>
				</description>
				<link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/blackburn-takes-swipe-at-net-n.php?rss=1#1378588</link>
				<guid>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/blackburn-takes-swipe-at-net-n.php?rss=1#1378588</guid>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:43:13 GMT</pubDate>
			</item>
		


       
    </channel>
</rss>
 
