Friday, February 10, 2012

HHS Urged To Rework Data Breach Rule

September 17, 2009

A member of the Health and Human Services Department's health IT policy committee is urging the agency to revise what she argues is an overly broad and unreliable provision of an otherwise solid interim final rule on data breach notification. The Center for Democracy and Technology's Deven McGraw voiced her concern with reporters earlier this week ahead of a Friday meeting of the health IT policy panel. The HHS rule, which is set to take effect Sept. 24, sets data security standards that the agency believes are strong enough to eliminate the need to notify consumers of a data breach -- but its so-called "harm standard" is sub-par, she said.

The interim final rule, which was issued last month, states that a breach does not occur unless the access, use or disclosure poses "a significant risk of financial, reputational, or other harm to individual." In the event of a breach, the rule requires covered entities to perform a risk assessment to determine if the harm standard is met. If they decide that the risk of harm to the individual is not significant, the covered entities never have to tell their patients that their sensitive health information was breached.

The language was not handed down as part of the $19 billion health IT section of the economic stimulus package and was expressly rejected by House staffers who helped craft the measure, McGraw said. She noted its inclusion by HHS is likely the result of lobbying on the part of the healthcare industry. CDT and its allies favor the approach taken by the Federal Trade Commission in its own data breach mandate, which takes effect the same day as the HHS rule. The FTC version stipulates that if an individual authorized the discharge of data, its release is not considered a breach.

The FTC's rule also allows for a vendor to engage in a risk analysis and states that if data was never acquired (i.e., officials are fairly certain that nobody saw the material), it does not count as a breach and notification does not have to occur. Both agencies have said they will not enforce the data beach rules for 180 days, during which time McGraw hopes that HHS will go back to the drawing board. Read more on this topic on CDT's blog here.

Join the Discussion

The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.

Comments powered by Disqus

 

Archives

Monthly Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

Recent Comments


Contributors

Juliana Gruenwald

Tech Writer

E-Mail: jgruenwald@nationaljournal.com.


Juliana Gruenwald has been covering tech and telecom issues for more than a decade for National Journal, Interactive Week, BNA and Congressional Quarterly. This is her second stint with National Journal. She was recruited by NJ in 1998 to help launch its first tech policy publication, Technology Daily. She left in 2000 to cover international tech and telecom issues for Ziff Davis Media's Interactive Week magazine. She started her career at United Press International as the wire service's first Helen Thomas Intern. She has a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Minnesota. A Minneapolis native, she misses the lakes but not the cold.


Josh Smith

Tech Reporter

E-Mail: joshsmith@nationaljournal.com.


Josh Smith covers technology policy as a staff reporter for National Journal. He previously interned at National Journal Daily, a Senate press office, and the Deseret News in Salt Lake City where he covered the state legislature, courts, and crime. In 2009 he graduated with honors from Southern Utah University after managing an award-winning student newspaper as editor-in-chief. Josh has received state, regional and national awards for his political and policy reporting, including first place in CapitolBeat’s 2009 Best of Statehouse Reporting college competition. A native of drop-dead-gorgeous Utah, Josh lives in Virginia with his wife, Amber.