<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Tech Daily Dose: Sessions Asks For Patent Report</title>
        <link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/07/sessions-asks-for-patent-repor.php?rss=1</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:09:36 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
       
        <item>
            <title>Sessions Asks For Patent Report</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Senate Judiciary ranking member <strong>Jeff Sessions</strong> has requested that Case Western Reserve University innovation expert <strong>Scott Shane</strong> analyze the potential impact of a pending bill's approach to administratively challenging a patent's validity after it is granted. The proposed changes to the Patent and Trademark Office's post-grant review process are included in a bill sponsored by Judiciary Chairman <strong>Patrick Leahy</strong>, which passed his committee 15-4 in April. Staffers for Leahy and Sessions have been meeting with stakeholders about the issue in recent weeks even as the panel focuses on the forthcoming confirmation hearings of Supreme Court nominee <strong>Sonia Sotomayor</strong>.</p>

<p>As amended, the measure would adopt House-passed text from 2007 that lengthens the timeline for challenging a granted patent and strips out a "public use or sale" provision that Leahy added as a basis for challenging a patent. Shane's <a href="http://www.mfgpatentpolicy.org/images/Apportionment_of_Damages_Adverse_Effects_Jan14_09.pdf">research</a> earlier this Congress on apportionment of damages concluded that adopting House language could lead to job loss and decreased R&D investment. Leahy's panel ultimately watered down the damages text so the bill could advance. Shane's report was commissioned by the Manufacturing Alliance on Patent Policy, a group backed by Corning, Monsanto, DuPont and others. His latest research will be ready for Sessions within two weeks, Tech Daily Dose has learned.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/congressdaily/cda_20090623_2284.php">Click here</a> to read recent <em>CongressDaily </em>coverage of the emerging conflict over post-grant review language (subscription required).</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/07/sessions-asks-for-patent-repor.php?rss=1</link>
            <guid>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2009/07/sessions-asks-for-patent-repor.php?rss=1</guid>

            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:09:36 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
		
		


       
    </channel>
</rss>
 
