National Journal.com

nationaljournal.com > Tech Daily Dose

CongressDaily Home NationalJournal.com

CongressDaily's Tech Daily Dose

Monday, June 1, 2009

Supreme Court To Hear Bilski Case

Thumbnail image for supremecourtus.jpgThe Supreme Court agreed Monday to consider what types of business methods qualify for patent protection in a case with ramifications for the software, biotechnology and financial services industries, Bloomberg News reported. The justices said they will review a lower court decision that narrowed the class of patentable inventions, excluding some innovations that do not have a physical component. Because it came from the federal appeals court that handles all patent appeals, the ruling had marked a watershed in U.S. intellectual property law. The case (Bilski v. Doll) will mark the first time since 1981 the Supreme Court has ruled on the types of innovations covered by the U.S. Patent Act.

Computer and Communications Industry Association President Ed Black said he was pleased with the additional opportunity the case provides for legal clarity. "The lack of limits on patentable subject matter as a result of the State Street decision has created chaos in the marketplace and provided fertile breeding ground for patent trolls," he said. "We are pleased by the federal circuit decision in Bilski because it cuts back on what has been an extremely problematic area in the patent system that stems from granting patents on abstract subject matter. We hope the Supreme Court will return to the wisdom of its earlier rulings and affirm strong principles about the limits of patentable subject matter."

More details about the case: Patently-O Blog, SCOTUS Blog, The 271 Patent Blog.

Categories:

Comments

To post a comment, you must provide a name and a valid e-mail address. Messages must be limited to 400 words. By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although Tech Daily Dose does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.

Advertisement
Get Print-friendly version of this page E-mail this page to a friend Subscribe to comments for Supreme Court To Hear Bilski Case Follow us on Twitter

CONTRIBUTORS


Advertisement

Stay Connected

Archives

Search Blog Entries

Blogroll

New Media

Online Politics

Tech Policy

Categories


Add Tech Daily Dose To Your Site

Sister Blogs

Experts: Health Care

Troublesome Directions

Latest response: Robert GreensteinNovember 20, 2009 3:38 pm
The Ninth Justice

Editor's Note

August 11, 2009 4:00 pm

Advertisement