That requirement could be waived if the president determines such a waiver would be in the national interest of the United State but he would have to report to Congress on the reasons for the waiver. "It is utterly outrageous that Western companies sell equipment that allows the Iranian government to spy on their citizens, prevent communications between citizens and thwart any type of uprising against the regime," Schumer said in a press release. "This legislation is going to crack down on these companies so that we can do our part in preventing this regime from controlling the Iranian people."

The Wall Street Journal reported this week that the systems used by Iran to spy on its citizens and stifle communications were installed by Nokia and Siemens. According to a federal spending Web site, Siemens has almost 2,000 contracts with the U.S. government, including 300 contracts with the Pentagon as well as other deals with the Department of Homeland Security, Justice Department, and the Department of Energy. The deals total over $250 million in 2009 alone. The joint venture, Nokia Siemens Networks, has at least six contracts with the U.S. government, totaling $5 million.

Are we going to sanction mainland China's regime?

I seriously doubt it.  But then, consistency is the hobgoblin of honest politicians - a nonexistent breed.

Not that we shouldn't sanction somebody.  In my opinion we would get more mileage from hefty fines and other restrictions and punishments including prison time for corporations and the specific executives who peddle such tawdry deals with such scummy regimes as the mullah's of Iran and the communist party of China.

So.  Are you listening, Cisco?  Better start cranking up those lobbyists and donations.  Why not hold another breakfast exempt from transparency rules?  Maybe worth a shot?  (Remember, an honest politician is one who stays bought (h/t to RAH)).

For what it's worth.

  - Dave Manchester

You see what I mean?