Sens. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., will soon introduce legislation to sanction any company that sells sensitive technology aiding the Iranian regime in monitoring or blocking the Internet connections or cellular phone conversations of protesters. The bill, which will be filed in the coming days, would require the Obama administration to identify foreign firms that export certain equipment to Iran and those companies would be barred from applying for contracts with the U.S. government, or renewing expiring ones, unless they first terminated those exports.
That requirement could be waived if the president determines such a waiver would be in the national interest of the United State but he would have to report to Congress on the reasons for the waiver. "It is utterly outrageous that Western companies sell equipment that allows the Iranian government to spy on their citizens, prevent communications between citizens and thwart any type of uprising against the regime," Schumer said in a press release. "This legislation is going to crack down on these companies so that we can do our part in preventing this regime from controlling the Iranian people."
The Wall Street Journal reported this week that the systems used by Iran to spy on its citizens and stifle communications were installed by Nokia and Siemens. According to a federal spending Web site, Siemens has almost 2,000 contracts with the U.S. government, including 300 contracts with the Pentagon as well as other deals with the Department of Homeland Security, Justice Department, and the Department of Energy. The deals total over $250 million in 2009 alone. The joint venture, Nokia Siemens Networks, has at least six contracts with the U.S. government, totaling $5 million.
Separately, Schumer and Graham urged Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton to press European Union officials at the upcoming G-8 summit to step up efforts to restrict the sale of monitoring equipment to Iran. Following the Chinese government's crackdown on protestors at Tiananmen Square, Congress passed a law limiting sales to China of tools or technology that could be used for the purposes of suppression. "Companies that provide technology to the Iranian regime to control the Internet must be forced to pay a heavy price," Graham said. "While strong statements made in support of the Iranian people are critically important, it is equally important to have strong action to aid their cause."
On Thursday Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Chairman Joseph Lieberman announced that he will join and Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Graham to offer seperate legislation after the July 4 recess to expand TV and radio broadcasting into Iran and "prevent the Iranian regime from slamming shut the virtual door to the rest of the world provided by the Internet." The bill would help counter the Iranian government's efforts by boosting support for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty's Farsi-language radio station and the Voice of America's Persian News Network. It would also help ensure the Iranian people have access to other technologies including social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter and cellular phone networks.
To post a comment, you must provide a name and a valid e-mail address. Messages must be limited to 400 words. By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although Tech Daily Dose does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.
New Media
Online Politics
Tech Policy
Responded on August 20, 2009 2:16 AM
ehsan8444
i love u ok see u at please
Responded on June 30, 2009 10:39 AM
Dave Manchester
If the US is going to lay restrictions on tech exports, "sanction any company that sells sensitive technology aiding the Iranian regime in monitoring or blocking the Internet connections or cellular phone conversations of protesters," then the natural question is: Are we going to sanction mainland China's regime? I seriously doubt it. But then, consistency is the hobgoblin of honest politicians - a nonexistent breed. Not that we shouldn't sanction somebody. In my opinion we would get more mileage from hefty fines and other restrictions and punishments including prison time for corporations and the specific executives who peddle such tawdry deals with such scummy regimes as the mullah's of Iran and the communist party of China. So. Are you listening, Cisco? Better start cranking up those lobbyists and donations. Why not hold another breakfast exempt from transparency rules? Maybe worth a shot? (Remember, an honest politician is one who stays bought (h/t to RAH)). For what it's worth. - Dave Manchest...
Read More
If the US is going to lay restrictions on tech exports, "sanction any company that sells sensitive technology aiding the Iranian regime in monitoring or blocking the Internet connections or cellular phone conversations of protesters," then the natural question is:
Are we going to sanction mainland China's regime?
I seriously doubt it. But then, consistency is the hobgoblin of honest politicians - a nonexistent breed.
Not that we shouldn't sanction somebody. In my opinion we would get more mileage from hefty fines and other restrictions and punishments including prison time for corporations and the specific executives who peddle such tawdry deals with such scummy regimes as the mullah's of Iran and the communist party of China.
So. Are you listening, Cisco? Better start cranking up those lobbyists and donations. Why not hold another breakfast exempt from transparency rules? Maybe worth a shot? (Remember, an honest politician is one who stays bought (h/t to RAH)).
For what it's worth.
- Dave Manchester
Collapse
Responded on June 29, 2009 5:05 PM
richard t marotte
Hard to believe that anyone will enforce any rules on these Tele-Communications industry. Our government allows the Tele_com iindustry to walk all over us.
Responded on June 29, 2009 4:49 PM
Tim
It is amazing that you wrote this story without a hint of irony. My God, you don't mean that the US would spy on its own citizens, would suppress dissent within its own borders, or imprison people because of the color of their skin. How dare you even suggest the idea. I hate to bust your bubble, but the US government is the evil empire. Our so called elected officials are the paid mouth pieces for these corporations. You don't need to go to Iran to find tyranny. Just look out side your front door.
Responded on June 29, 2009 4:12 PM
tunghoy
@Mel -- you hit the nail on the head. My thoughts, exactly. And while we're at it, let's attach a rider to this bill that revokes Fox Noise's press credentials. They aren't much better than the official Islamic Republic News Agency.
Responded on June 29, 2009 3:46 PM
STEVE
REPUGS= IRAN/CONTRA= TRAITORS= DEALING WITH THE ENEMY= PRECOTT BUSH= POPPY= W. NONE OF THESE CRIMINALS GOES TO JAIL. THEY GET JOBS WITH FOX NEWS.
Responded on June 29, 2009 3:41 PM
Mel
How about having the same sanctions for companies doing it to us over here?
Responded on June 26, 2009 9:43 PM
John Jay
I would be more worried about the fact that our government is coming to the table with a full list of companies who they are aware of that know how to control the internet and another list of how to manipulate television. People who actually have contracts with the U.S. govt. right now..... contracts to control the internet and manipulate our television.
You see what I mean?
Responded on June 26, 2009 6:04 PM
EDMUND GALKE
ALL OF YOU PEOPLE SHOULD BE AWARE THAT SIEMENS HAS ALREADY SOLD SIX MACHINES TO IRAN, WHOSE COMPONENTS CAN BE USED IN NUCLEAR DEVICES, MUCH MORE DEADLY THAN SPY EQUIPMENT.