Thursday, February 9, 2012

Lofgren 'Very Nervous' About IP Pact

May 6, 2009

Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., has become increasingly concerned about the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, which has been in the works, largely behind closed doors, for more than a year. Amid fears from watchdog groups who argued the process between the U.S. government and a handful of key trading partners was too secretive, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative in April released a six-page summary of ACTA talks. Lofgren told a crowd of high-tech executives Wednesday the outline may not be sufficient in quelling fears about requirements that could be imposed on Internet service providers and others. She said the document "makes me very nervous," particularly as European proposals have surfaced to regulate ISPs as part of efforts to crack down on copyright infringement.

In her remarks to the Computer and Communications Industry Association, Lofgren also spoke about the congressional movement to overhaul the U.S. patent system. Silicon Valley executives told her in recent meetings that a compromise bill, which last month passed the Senate Judiciary Committee, could be worse than no bill at all due to what they believe is watered down damages language. "Last year we had a strong bill," Lofgren said of the version that passed the House. The Senate measure stalled last spring after Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy and then-ranking member Arlen Specter could not see eye to eye on damages text. "Now we have a bill that opponents of patent reform are rallying around," she said of Leahy's legislation as amended.

Lofgren also said the so-called "orphan works" issue is still on her radar. Legislation aimed at reworking a portion of U.S. copyright law that deals with musical tracks, writings, images, videos or other content whose owners cannot be easily gained some traction in the 110th Congress but did not make it to the House floor. Later in her speech, Lofgren said a bill she sponsored to provide for a five year moratorium on any new discriminatory wireless tax or fees should collect "a lot of cosponsors on both sides of the aisle." "I think we have an opportunity to move that," she said.

Join the Discussion

The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.

Comments powered by Disqus

 

Archives

Monthly Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

Recent Comments


Contributors

Juliana Gruenwald

Tech Writer

E-Mail: jgruenwald@nationaljournal.com.


Juliana Gruenwald has been covering tech and telecom issues for more than a decade for National Journal, Interactive Week, BNA and Congressional Quarterly. This is her second stint with National Journal. She was recruited by NJ in 1998 to help launch its first tech policy publication, Technology Daily. She left in 2000 to cover international tech and telecom issues for Ziff Davis Media's Interactive Week magazine. She started her career at United Press International as the wire service's first Helen Thomas Intern. She has a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Minnesota. A Minneapolis native, she misses the lakes but not the cold.


Josh Smith

Tech Reporter

E-Mail: joshsmith@nationaljournal.com.


Josh Smith covers technology policy as a staff reporter for National Journal. He previously interned at National Journal Daily, a Senate press office, and the Deseret News in Salt Lake City where he covered the state legislature, courts, and crime. In 2009 he graduated with honors from Southern Utah University after managing an award-winning student newspaper as editor-in-chief. Josh has received state, regional and national awards for his political and policy reporting, including first place in CapitolBeat’s 2009 Best of Statehouse Reporting college competition. A native of drop-dead-gorgeous Utah, Josh lives in Virginia with his wife, Amber.