Wednesday, May 23, 2012

U.S. Plans New Satellite Program

April 8, 2009 | 9:09 AM

sat.jpgThe Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Defense Department want to modernize the nation's aging satellite-imagery architecture by evolving government-owned satellite designs and enhancing use of U.S. commercial providers, officials said Tuesday. Multiple government studies and an independent panel of former defense and intelligence experts demonstrated the need for a new path forward after examining current imagery, alternative architectures, cost and affordability, technological risk and industry readiness. A new plan by ODNI requires congressional approval but officials hope once that happens, implementation can begin in the coming months. Commercial imagery elements of the initiative would likely be operational in several years and the overall system would be fully deployed before the end of the next decade.

Under the proposal, government satellites would be developed, built and operated by the National Reconnaissance Office and the defense and intelligence communities would increase the use of imagery available through U.S. commercial providers. The additional capability would provide the government with more flexibility to respond to unforeseen challenges, officials said. The less complex satellites based on technologies already in production by U.S. vendors would be available sooner than the much more capable NRO-developed systems. The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency would continue to integrate capabilities as well as imagery products.

"Imagery is a core component of our national security that supports our troops, foreign policy, homeland security and the needs of our intelligence community," Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair said in a press release. "Our proposal is an integrated, sustainable approach based on cost, feasibility and timeliness that meets the needs of our country now and puts in place a system to ensure that we will not have imagery gaps in the future." He added that under the existing system, "we are living with the consequences of past mistakes in acquisition strategy, and we cannot afford to do so." Read more on this in CongressDaily's PM Edition.

Join the Discussion

The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.

Comments powered by Disqus

 

Search This Blog
Archives

Monthly Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

Recent Comments


Contributors

Juliana Gruenwald

Tech Writer

E-Mail: jgruenwald@nationaljournal.com.


Juliana Gruenwald has been covering tech and telecom issues for more than a decade for National Journal, Interactive Week, BNA and Congressional Quarterly. This is her second stint with National Journal. She was recruited by NJ in 1998 to help launch its first tech policy publication, Technology Daily. She left in 2000 to cover international tech and telecom issues for Ziff Davis Media's Interactive Week magazine. She started her career at United Press International as the wire service's first Helen Thomas Intern. She has a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Minnesota. A Minneapolis native, she misses the lakes but not the cold.


Josh Smith

Tech Reporter

E-Mail: joshsmith@nationaljournal.com.


Josh Smith covers technology policy as a staff reporter for National Journal. He previously interned at National Journal Daily, a Senate press office, and the Deseret News in Salt Lake City where he covered the state legislature, courts, and crime. In 2009 he graduated with honors from Southern Utah University after managing an award-winning student newspaper as editor-in-chief. Josh has received state, regional and national awards for his political and policy reporting, including first place in CapitolBeat’s 2009 Best of Statehouse Reporting college competition. A native of drop-dead-gorgeous Utah, Josh lives in Virginia with his wife, Amber.