Friday, February 10, 2012

House Panels Clear Tech Stimulus Plans

January 23, 2009

The House Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means Committees approved their sections of the chamber's economic stimulus package after marathon mark up sessions on Thursday. CongressDaily has two extensive reports that can be accessed here and here (subscription required).

Energy and Commerce Highlights:

• Accepted an amendment by Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich, to set a strict timetable for FCC implementation of a formula for distributing broadband money to "unserved" and "underserved" areas.
• Rejected an amendment by Rep. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., that called for areas with no service at all to be helped first, then "underserved" areas.
• Rejected an amendment by Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., to prevent states attorneys from filing suits under federal privacy laws.
• Rejected an amendment by Rep. Michael Burgess, R-Texas, to allow hospitals and doctors to share IT and staff.
• Accepted an amendment from Rep. Ed Markey, D-Mass., to add additional security requirements to protect patients' personal health information.

Ways and Means Highlights:

• Rejected an amendment by Rep. Ginny Brown-Waite, R-Fla., requesting several GAO studies, including one on the adoption rate of health IT systems.
• Rejected an amendment by Rep. Dave Reichert, R-Wash., stating that no health IT funds should be spent until the HHS secretary certifies that interoperable systems are available.
• Rejected an amendment by Rep. Wally Herger, R-Calif., that proposed recipients of health IT incentive payments be required to meet price transparency standards.
• Rejected an amendment by Rep. Sam Johnson, R-Texas, that would have replaced the Medicare and Medicaid subsidies with tax credits.
• Rejected an amendment by Rep. Charles Boustany, R-La., to delay the effective date of the IT program until HHS determined the impact of security and confidentiality standards on providers.

Meanwhile, lobbying on the $20 billion health IT portion of the stimulus picked up. Industry and consumer groups with a stake in the funds wrote several letters to congressional leaders. Read CongressDaily's coverage here (subscription required).

Join the Discussion

The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.

Comments powered by Disqus

 

Archives

Monthly Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

Recent Comments


Contributors

Juliana Gruenwald

Tech Writer

E-Mail: jgruenwald@nationaljournal.com.


Juliana Gruenwald has been covering tech and telecom issues for more than a decade for National Journal, Interactive Week, BNA and Congressional Quarterly. This is her second stint with National Journal. She was recruited by NJ in 1998 to help launch its first tech policy publication, Technology Daily. She left in 2000 to cover international tech and telecom issues for Ziff Davis Media's Interactive Week magazine. She started her career at United Press International as the wire service's first Helen Thomas Intern. She has a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Minnesota. A Minneapolis native, she misses the lakes but not the cold.


Josh Smith

Tech Reporter

E-Mail: joshsmith@nationaljournal.com.


Josh Smith covers technology policy as a staff reporter for National Journal. He previously interned at National Journal Daily, a Senate press office, and the Deseret News in Salt Lake City where he covered the state legislature, courts, and crime. In 2009 he graduated with honors from Southern Utah University after managing an award-winning student newspaper as editor-in-chief. Josh has received state, regional and national awards for his political and policy reporting, including first place in CapitolBeat’s 2009 Best of Statehouse Reporting college competition. A native of drop-dead-gorgeous Utah, Josh lives in Virginia with his wife, Amber.