Appeals Court To Hear High-Profile Patent Case
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the panel that hears patent disputes from around the country, is slated to examine a high-profile case on Friday involving a dispute over Patent and Trademark Office rules announced last fall aimed at increasing patent system efficiency. The PTO's regulations, which limit applicants to filing two new continuing applications and one request for continued examination, were challenged by drug manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline and an independent inventor, Triantafyllos Tafas. Read CongressDaily's recent coverage here and here.
U.S. District Judge James Cacheris of the Eastern District of Virginia decided in April that the rules were an improper expansion of the PTO's statutory authority and the agency took its case to the appellate panel. At the time of the decision, GlaxoSmithKline, which complained that about 100 of its pending applications would be jeopardized, said the lower court's judgment was "in support of innovation across all industries." The PTO believes that its rules are consistent with existing statutes and would strengthen the U.S. patent system for all, an agency spokeswoman said.

Microsoft researchers have 
Close to all the newly elected members of the House and Senate used some type of new media tool on their campaign pages and nearly half provided links to online blogs, according to a National Journal analysis. A little under half of the elected members also linked to 
Is the economic slump impacting Sin City's hotels, which in previous years have noticeably increased their rates in anticipation of the annual
The House Democratic Caucus on Thursday reelected Rep. Bart Gordon as chairman of the Science and Technology Committee for the 111th Congress and the 12-term Tennesseean didn't waste time laying out his top agenda item for the new year -- helping craft policies that can grow new sectors of the U.S. economy and ensure the nation's long-term competitiveness. "The major challenges facing our country -- a foundering economy, a changing climate, a growing need for clean energy we produce at home -- will be solved by science, technology, and American innovation," he said in a statement.
Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., has ousted Rep. John Dingell, D-Mich., as chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee. The House Democratic Caucus ousted Dingell on a secret-ballot vote, following a tight Steering Committee vote Wednesday. The unofficial tally was 137-122. The vote weakens the seniority system and signals the rise of California liberals who backed Waxman. It also strengthens House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who stayed neutral but whose allies supported Waxman's bid. The result gives Waxman, an environmentalist, a key role in shaping legislation on climate change, energy, healthcare and other priorities of President-elect Barack Obama. Dingell will stay on as chairman emeritus.
As expected, FCC Chairman Kevin Martin poked fun at himself at Tuesday night's annual Federal Communications Bar Association dinner. Following a brief line-up of one-liners, he wrapped up his self-deprecating speech with a list of potential positions he might pursue when he leaves office early next year. Some of the funniest suggestions he dished out (to ample applause):
From the file labeled "everyone loves a gimmick" comes "Raders Of The Lost Art," a Dec. 4 event at the Newseum sponsored by
Eric Schmidt, chairman and chief executive officer of Internet giant Google, will speak Tuesday on “What’s Ahead: Technology, Economic Growth and Open Government.” During his address to the New America Foundation, Schmidt will discuss the need to build a 21st century infrastructure, support for research and innovation, repairs to the U.S. education system, and ways to make government more open and responsive. Schmidt, who is on the foundation's board, is said to be in the running to serve as the nation’s chief technology officer -- a position that President-elect Barack Obama envisioned as part of his technology policy platform. Schmidt threw his support behind Obama in the final weeks of the campaign and is on the transition team's economic advisory board. Learn more about this event
Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez appears to have reversed course on his opposition to the newly created intellectual property enforcement coordinator position within the White House. In an interview with CongressDaily this week, the former Kellog Co. chairman said the change "puts IP rights front-and-center [and] will make it a priority for the White House and not just for Commerce" where a similar post had been housed. Intellectual property enforcement is "such an important part of our future, we want it to cut across agencies," he said.
House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers will abolish the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property in the new Congress and instead keep intellectual property issues at the full committee level, a Judiciary aide told CongressDaily today. A Subcommittee on Courts and Antitrust will be created, but no other subcommittee changes are expected, the staffer said.




The GOP regained the Texas seat of former Majority Leader Tom DeLay Tuesday night, with Republican Pete Olson beating Democratic Rep. Nick Lampson. The change also means that Congress will lose a prominent Internet era child safety advocate who cosponsored a number of key bills, including several that were signed by President Bush this year. One such measure strengthened and reauthorized funding for the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and another authorized a $320 million funding boost for Justice Department-supported Internet Crimes Against Children task forces. That bill, which was combined with a proposal from Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., also imposed higher penalties on Internet providers that do not report child pornography found on their networks.



On Tuesday morning, while most of the country focused on voter turnout and predicting how the chips may fall for Sens. John McCain and Barack Obama, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the hotly debated case, FCC v. Fox Television Stations. At issue was whether the commission provided an adequate explanation or acted arbitrarily and capriciously, in changing its policy to permit isolated uses of expletives on broadcast TV to be considered "indecent" under federal law. The transcript of the argument is available 

