National Journal MagazineNational Journal MagazineThe HotlineCongress Daily
Search Congress Daily
 
Advanced Search
About CD
Contacts
Reprints
Privacy Policy


Powered by
Movable Type 3.2


« Biotech Visionary Makes Tech-Tastic Predictions | Main | Tech Groups Want New Trial In Major Copyright Case »

Telecom Titans Tussle Over Pending FCC Proceeding

Verizon lobbyist Tom Tauke and National Cable and Telecommunications Association President Kyle McSlarrow traded blows in the blogosphere on Friday. Finally, these characteristically sedate policy blogs are being used for a good, old-fashioned catfight.

Tauke posted an item offering his perspective about the potential impact of the FCC overturning a recommendation by the agency's enforcement bureau to deny the cable industry's complaint against Verizon's "win-back" marketing efforts. He said the rumored action would thwart consumer choice and would impose more restrictions on telecoms' communications with their own customers.

McSlarrow fired back with his own blog post, calling Tauke's talk "a little over the top." "Thwart consumer choice?” C’mon, Tom. This is really about Verizon trying to thwart competition . . . again," he wrote. What's really going on, according to McSlarrow, is that for the first time in history, Verizon's incumbent position in the phone marketplace is being challenged.

Read Tauke's take here and McSlarrow's reaction here.
Update: Ding! Ding! Round two. Tauke takes another swing.

(Photo Credit: jsome1 via Flickr)

Posted by Andrew on June 20, 2008 01:54 PM | Permalink


Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://amcblog.nationaljournal.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4142


Comments



Post a Comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

By using this Service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although Tech Daily Dose does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.