<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Tech Daily Dose: Lawmaker Back In Action Thanks To American R&amp;D</title>
        <link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2008/02/lawmaker-back-in-action-thanks.php?rss=1</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:08:40 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
       
        <item>
            <title>Lawmaker Back In Action Thanks To American R&amp;D</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Rep. <strong>Dutch Ruppersberger</strong> on Tuesday praised American ingenuity in the medical arena for getting him back on his feet fast after undergoing a serious surgery. The Maryland Democrat is a member of the House Appropriations Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Subcommittee, which held its first budget hearing of the year on the Bush administration's FY09 science and technology portfolio.</p>

<p>He told White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Director <strong>John Marburger</strong>, who testified at the hearing, that he did not expect to be back to work so soon after experiencing a spinal fusion procedure. "Thank goodness for research and discovery and they're able to fix your back," Ruppersberger said. Read more about the hearing in <em>CongressDaily</em>'s <a href="http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/congressdaily/">PM edition</a>.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2008/02/lawmaker-back-in-action-thanks.php?rss=1</link>
            <guid>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2008/02/lawmaker-back-in-action-thanks.php?rss=1</guid>

            <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:08:40 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
		
		
			<item>
				<title>SoseDodsvow responded on September  2, 09 04:23 AM</title>
				<description>

					
&lt;div class="ad" style="float:right;margin: 0px, 0, 10, 10;"&gt;
&lt;h6&gt;Advertisement&lt;/h6&gt;
&lt;a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=techdailydose;series=techdailydose;medium=rss;sz=300x250;ord=123456789?" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=techdailydose;series=techdailydose;medium=rss;tile=2;sz=300x250;ord=123456789?" width="300" height="250" border="0" alt=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;



					<![CDATA[<p>What is the adjustment between Windows 7 RC & RTM portrayal in terms of services that they provide? <br />
There are some software instead of standard of TrueCrypt that I be struck by tested that can be installed into Windows 7 RC style, but cannot be installed into Windows 7 RTM version. I need to recollect what is the distinction between these 2 version, in terms of their services and or another other factors that can character to such an iniquity in the establishment of TrueCrypt in Windows 7 RTM version<a />.  Can anyone help? Thank you!</p>...]]>
				</description>
				<link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2008/02/lawmaker-back-in-action-thanks.php?rss=1#1350451</link>
				<guid>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2008/02/lawmaker-back-in-action-thanks.php?rss=1#1350451</guid>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:23:37 GMT</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Elernelap responded on July 23, 09 06:15 PM</title>
				<description>

					
&lt;div class="ad" style="float:right;margin: 0px, 0, 10, 10;"&gt;
&lt;h6&gt;Advertisement&lt;/h6&gt;
&lt;a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=techdailydose;series=techdailydose;medium=rss;sz=300x250;ord=123456789?" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=techdailydose;series=techdailydose;medium=rss;tile=2;sz=300x250;ord=123456789?" width="300" height="250" border="0" alt=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;



					<![CDATA[<p>It's better to leave Windows XP and just upgrade your laptop. It's much better. Besides, Windows XP is way better then Windows Me. Windows Me is obsolete and many programs that can run with XP, can't run with Me.</p>

<p>-------------------</p>...]]>
				</description>
				<link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2008/02/lawmaker-back-in-action-thanks.php?rss=1#1343754</link>
				<guid>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2008/02/lawmaker-back-in-action-thanks.php?rss=1#1343754</guid>
				<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:15:33 GMT</pubDate>
			</item>
		


       
    </channel>
</rss>
 