<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Tech Daily Dose: U.S.-China WTO Case Filed. Now What?</title>
        <link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2007/04/uschina-wto-case-filed-now-wha.php?rss=1</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:48:25 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
       
        <item>
            <title>U.S.-China WTO Case Filed. Now What?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Members of the China Copyright Alliance lauded Monday's announcement by U.S. Trade Representative <strong>Susan Schwab</strong> that the U.S. would file two requests for <a href="http://www.wto.org">World Trade Organization</a> consultations with China due to the country's lax enforcement of intellectual property rights and barriers it imposes on trade in music, movies and books.</p>

<p>The Alliance consists of the Art Copyright Coalition, Association of American Publishers, Independent Film & Television Alliance, International Federation of the Phonographic Industry, Motion Picture Association of America and the Recording Industry Association of America. <em>Technology Daily</em>'s PM edition has <a href="http://nationaljournal.com/cgi-bin/ifetch4?ENG+TECHNOLOGY_DAILY_ALL-_-POLL_TRACK-_-AD_SPOTLIGHT+7-techdailyindex+1186873-REVERSE+0+1+1775+F+2+90+1+schwab">details of Schwab's announcement</a>. </p>

<p>So what happens now? According to the <a href="http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2007/04/us-filing-copyright-enforcement-case.php">Jurist</a>, the pair of cases enters a <a href="http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/disp1_e.htm">60-day consultation</a> period during which the U.S. and China will try to resolve their differences through negotiation. If the bilateral negotiations reach an impasse, WTO hearings will decide the outcome.</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.chinahearsay.com/?p=155">China Hearsay</a> blog, written by intellectual property attorney <strong>Stan Abrams</strong>, offers a detailed review of the WTO complaints and what they mean. Abrams works for Lehman, Lee & Xu, a Chinese law firm in Beijing.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2007/04/uschina-wto-case-filed-now-wha.php?rss=1</link>
            <guid>http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2007/04/uschina-wto-case-filed-now-wha.php?rss=1</guid>

            <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:48:25 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
		
		


       
    </channel>
</rss>
 
