Friday, February 10, 2012

Big Day @ SCOTUS

April 30, 2007

The Supreme Court handed down two major patent-related opinions on Monday -- KSR International v. Teleflex and Microsoft v. AT&T. Technology Daily's PM edition has one story on the rulings and another with reaction from the high-tech sector and attorneys.

But here's what more court watchers had to say…

Solveig Singleton of the Progress & Freedom Foundation said the court, which ruled in favor of KSR, "reached the right result." "The case is on the right track in paving the road for a more stringent standard of non-obviousness," she said.

Congress should exercise caution in the wake of the decision, Singleton said. "Rather than tackling the statutory standard of obviousness directly, address the better-understood institutional and legal process issues," she said. More circuit courts should hear patent appeals to give the U.S. Appeals Court for the Federal Circuit some feedback, she said.

The Computer and Communications Industry Association also hailed the KSR ruling. The "non-obviousness" standard had been eroded by lower courts and, as a result, "junk patents" thrive, the group said. According to CCIA President Ed Black, the ruling reaffirms what his group has long insisted -- that "the patent system’s purpose is to promote innovation, not patents."

The Association for Competitive Technology said the decisions in the two cases "bring some much needed common sense" to patent law. ACT Executive Director Morgan Reed said the KSR ruling in particular will make it much harder "to obtain and enforce the kind of absurd software patents that are threatening the future of the patent system."

"In overturning the Microsoft case, the court realized that "software is different than shrimp deveiners, and needs to be treated as such," Reed said. The original law was intended to prevent Deepsouth Packing from exporting its unassembled shrimp deveiners outside the U.S.

Over at SCOTUSblog, Dennis Crouch (known for his Patently-O blog) says the two decisions came out as expected. He believes both cases make patents less valuable. Because of KSR, patents will be more difficult to enforce and easier to invalidate. The AT&T case cuts in-half the value of many of today's most valuable software patents, he said. Also on SCOTUSblog: Joshua Sarnoff weighs in here and Michael Barclay too.

AT&T, which lost its case, was disappointed. Scott Frank, CEO of AT&T Knowledge Ventures, said "all U.S.-based sources of innovation -- including the software development community -- could benefit from patent laws that enable fair, appropriate protection and valuation of new technologies and inventions domestically and overseas."

"Our intellectual property protection and licensing program continues to focus on maximizing global access to AT&T innovations, while also ensuring that AT&T receives fair and appropriate compensation in return for its investments in research and innovation," Frank said.

The Software and Information Industry Association hailed the decision in the Microsoft case. General Counsel Mark Bohannon said he was “extremely pleased that the Supreme Court reversed the expansive interpretation of the Federal Circuit, which had exposed American software publishers producers to potentially global liability and upset previously settled law that limited the extraterritorial application of U.S. patent law.” SIIA filed briefs on Microsoft's behalf.

Join the Discussion

The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.

Comments powered by Disqus

 

Archives

Monthly Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

Recent Comments


Contributors

Juliana Gruenwald

Tech Writer

E-Mail: jgruenwald@nationaljournal.com.


Juliana Gruenwald has been covering tech and telecom issues for more than a decade for National Journal, Interactive Week, BNA and Congressional Quarterly. This is her second stint with National Journal. She was recruited by NJ in 1998 to help launch its first tech policy publication, Technology Daily. She left in 2000 to cover international tech and telecom issues for Ziff Davis Media's Interactive Week magazine. She started her career at United Press International as the wire service's first Helen Thomas Intern. She has a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Minnesota. A Minneapolis native, she misses the lakes but not the cold.


Josh Smith

Tech Reporter

E-Mail: joshsmith@nationaljournal.com.


Josh Smith covers technology policy as a staff reporter for National Journal. He previously interned at National Journal Daily, a Senate press office, and the Deseret News in Salt Lake City where he covered the state legislature, courts, and crime. In 2009 he graduated with honors from Southern Utah University after managing an award-winning student newspaper as editor-in-chief. Josh has received state, regional and national awards for his political and policy reporting, including first place in CapitolBeat’s 2009 Best of Statehouse Reporting college competition. A native of drop-dead-gorgeous Utah, Josh lives in Virginia with his wife, Amber.